The short answer
The productivity suite picks the AI assistant. Microsoft 365 shops should default to Copilot. Google Workspace shops should default to Gemini. ChatGPT Team or Enterprise belongs alongside either one for research and deeper general-purpose work. Free-tier accounts on personal devices are the shadow-AI risk and should be governed out of the environment before they become a Privacy Act problem.
Side by side, on the dimensions that actually matter
We have skipped the feature checkbox tables. These are the six dimensions that decide the conversation in nine out of ten Australian SMB rollouts.
Where it sits in your stack
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Inside Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, OneDrive, Loop).
ChatGPT
Standalone web and mobile app. Connectors and a desktop app exist but require deliberate integration.
Google Gemini
Inside Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Meet, Drive) and standalone in the Gemini app.
Data boundary
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Microsoft 365 Copilot processing for Australian customers stays inside the Australia data boundary. Tenant data is not used to train the underlying foundation models.
ChatGPT
Free and Plus tiers can use prompts for training unless opted out. ChatGPT Team, Enterprise and Edu plans do not. Data residency commitments are weaker than M365 for AU.
Google Gemini
Workspace tenants get the Workspace data protection commitments. Free Gemini app users are governed by Google consumer terms. Different surfaces, very different controls.
Identity and access
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Uses Microsoft Entra ID. Honours your existing conditional access, sensitivity labels and SharePoint permissions. Inherits whatever oversharing already exists in your tenant.
ChatGPT
OpenID Connect SSO available on Team plus tiers. Group-level access controls are basic compared to Entra. Most Australian SMBs land here via individual sign-up first.
Google Gemini
Uses Google Workspace identity. Inherits Drive sharing posture. Same tenant-data-risk pattern as Copilot if Drive is poorly governed.
Licensing reality
Microsoft 365 Copilot
AUD $44.40 per user per month, on top of a qualifying M365 licence (Business Standard / Premium or E3 / E5). All-in cost is the real number to plan against.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT Team approximately AUD $40 per user per month, Enterprise priced by negotiation. Pricing in AUD has shifted twice in the last twelve months.
Google Gemini
Gemini for Workspace bundled into Workspace Business and Enterprise tiers from January 2025. Effectively included rather than separately licensed for most Workspace clients.
Where it earns its keep
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Meeting recap and follow-up actions in Teams, drafting in Word, summarising long Outlook threads, building first-draft Excel formulas, retrieving across SharePoint with permission awareness.
ChatGPT
Open-ended research, brainstorming, coding, document analysis, image generation, voice mode, custom GPTs for repeatable workflows.
Google Gemini
In-line drafting across Workspace apps, NotebookLM for grounded research, Veo for video, deep integration with Google Search.
Where it underperforms
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Quality only as good as the tenant data behind it. Disappointing when SharePoint structure is poor or when Microsoft Graph is not well populated. Limited multimodal capability vs ChatGPT.
ChatGPT
No native access to your business data unless you connect it. Easy to land in a shadow-IT pattern where staff paste sensitive data into personal accounts.
Google Gemini
Strong Workspace integration assumes you are a Workspace shop. Limited value if your business runs Microsoft 365.
The decision frame we actually use
Four common scenarios. Pick the one closest to your reality.
You run Microsoft 365
Default to Microsoft 365 Copilot for staff productivity work. Use ChatGPT Team or Enterprise as a complement for research, deep document analysis and coding. Keep both in named licence pools, not free tier sprawl.
You run Google Workspace
Default to Gemini for Workspace. It is now bundled into Business and Enterprise tiers and integrates natively with Gmail, Docs and Drive. Add ChatGPT Team if your staff need a stronger general-purpose assistant alongside it.
You run a mixed or fragmented stack
Standardise the productivity suite first. Picking an AI assistant before you settle the underlying suite usually produces the worst of both worlds. The suite decision drives the AI decision in 9 out of 10 cases.
You handle highly sensitive data
Prioritise tenant-grade plans (Copilot, ChatGPT Enterprise, Gemini for Workspace Enterprise). Document the data boundary in your privacy policy and brief the board ahead of the Privacy Act ADM transparency rule landing 10 December 2026.
The three patterns we steer Australian boards away from
Buying Copilot before the M365 tenant is governed
Copilot inherits whatever oversharing already exists in SharePoint and OneDrive. Rolling it out into an ungoverned tenant produces a stream of permission-leak incidents inside the first quarter. The tenant uplift comes first.
Letting free-tier ChatGPT use sit in the environment
Staff using personal ChatGPT accounts on work devices is shadow IT with a Privacy Act exposure. Replace it with a named-licence ChatGPT Team or Enterprise pool, document acceptable use, and log it.
Picking the AI tool before settling the productivity suite
A business running both Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace in parallel cannot rationalise its AI assistant choice. Settle the suite, then pick the assistant. Doing it the other way around wastes licence spend and confuses staff.
Common questions
Can we run all three AI assistants at the same time?
Is it safer to use Copilot than ChatGPT for Australian business?
Do any of these touch the Voluntary AI Safety Standard?
What about open-source models like Llama or Mistral?
How much does Microsoft 365 Copilot cost per user in Australia?
Does the Privacy Act ADM transparency rule affect which AI platform we choose?
Need someone to make the call with you?
We run AI platform decision reviews for Australian leadership teams. Two-hour working session, clear written recommendation, no obligation to proceed with implementation.

Remote Support