All Guides
Video Conferencing Guide

Teams vs Zoom vs Webex vs Google Meet

Choosing a video and collaboration platform is not just about which one has better video quality. It is about how your team works, who you meet with, whether you need to replace your phone system, and what software you already pay for.

Last updated 4 October 20266 min read

The biggest mistake businesses make

The biggest mistake is paying for multiple overlapping platforms at the same time, because nobody made a deliberate decision, which confuses staff about which to use for what and creates fragmentation. The right answer is usually one primary platform for internal collaboration and one fallback for external guests. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Fifty-eight per cent of professionals in a global survey cite software or technical issues as the most common challenge in video conferences, so standardising on one well-configured platform reduces the support load that overlap creates. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Paying for multiple overlapping platforms

Many organisations end up with Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet all active at the same time, with staff confused about which to use for what. The right answer is usually one primary platform for internal collaboration and one fallback for external guests who cannot or will not install anything.

Which platform wins for each use case

In the global videoconferencing software market, Zoom held a 55.44 per cent share and Microsoft Teams held 20.93 per cent, with Webex at 9.43 per cent and Google Meet at 5.32 per cent, so Zoom and Teams together account for more than three quarters of the market and most businesses only need to choose between those two. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Daily internal team collaboration

Persistent channels, file sharing, and chat threads replace email for internal communication.

Microsoft Teams

Client-facing video calls

Easiest join experience for external participants with no account required. Reliable across all devices.

Zoom

Board meetings and formal sessions

Webex for regulated industries needing compliance recording. Teams for organisations already on M365.

Webex or Teams

Webinars and large external events

Registration, Q&A, panelist management, and audience analytics are strong on Zoom.

Zoom Webinars

Replacing your office phone system

If you are on M365, Teams Phone consolidates your PBX into your existing Microsoft environment. No separate system.

Teams Phone

Google Workspace businesses

Integrated with Calendar and Drive. No additional cost on Workspace Business plans.

Google Meet

What each platform is actually built for

Microsoft Teams is built for businesses already on Microsoft 365 because it bundles chat, file sharing via SharePoint and telephony into your existing licences, while Zoom leads on guest join experience for external participants who have no Microsoft account, and Webex remains relevant for regulated industries needing end-to-end encryption and compliance recording. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Google Meet is included in Google Workspace at no extra cost and integrates with Calendar and Drive, but lacks the webinar capabilities and persistent team channels that make Teams or Zoom more complete collaboration platforms, so it suits Google Workspace teams as an internal meeting tool rather than a primary platform. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Microsoft 365

Microsoft Teams

Built for businesses already on Microsoft 365

Internal collaboration, persistent team chat, file sharing via SharePoint, and integrated voice calling via Teams Phone.

  • Deep integration with Outlook, OneDrive, SharePoint, and the rest of M365
  • Teams Phone replaces your entire PBX with cloud telephony
  • Best for day-to-day staff collaboration and project communication
  • Meeting recordings, transcripts, and Copilot AI summaries built in

Avoid if

If your business does not use Microsoft 365, you give up most of what makes Teams valuable.

Video First

Zoom

The easiest video meeting experience for external participants

Client-facing calls, webinars, large external events, and situations where the other party should not need to install anything or log in to join.

  • Strong video quality and reliability
  • Easiest join experience for guests with no Microsoft or Google account
  • Zoom Webinars scales to thousands of attendees with registration and Q&A
  • Zoom Phone available if you want to consolidate PSTN calling

Avoid if

No meaningful file collaboration or persistent team channels. Not a replacement for Teams or Slack.

Cisco

Webex

Enterprise-grade meetings with strong security and compliance controls

Government, legal, healthcare, and regulated industries that need end-to-end encryption, compliance recording, and granular admin controls.

  • Strong security certifications including FedRAMP and ISO 27001
  • End-to-end encryption for meetings and messaging
  • Webex Calling integrates enterprise telephony
  • Better suited for formal board meetings and regulated environments than casual team chat

Avoid if

User experience is not as polished as Zoom or Teams. Integration ecosystem is narrower.

Google Workspace

Google Meet

Built for businesses already on Google Workspace

Teams running Google Workspace who want video meetings tightly integrated with Calendar, Drive, and Gmail.

  • One-click join from Google Calendar invites
  • No separate app required on most devices
  • Included in Google Workspace at no extra cost
  • Simple and lightweight with fewer advanced features than Teams or Zoom

Avoid if

Limited webinar capabilities and no meaningful persistent team channels. Not suitable as your only collaboration platform.

Why Teams is more than a video call tool

Teams is more than a video call tool because it becomes the single place a team communicates, collaborates on documents, manages projects and makes calls when configured with proper channel structure and SharePoint integration, and Teams Phone replaces an entire PBX with cloud telephony within the app staff already use. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Ninety-four per cent of HR leaders attest that remote work and video conferencing increased productivity, and 99 per cent of employees worldwide say video conferencing enhanced the communication experience, so the question for Microsoft 365 businesses is whether they are using Teams to that potential or paying separately for Zoom and fragmenting communication. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Most businesses that dismiss Teams have only seen it used poorly. When Teams is configured correctly with proper channel structure, SharePoint integration, and clear naming conventions, it becomes the single place your team communicates, collaborates on documents, manages projects, and makes calls.

Teams Phone is one of the most underutilised features in Microsoft 365. It replaces your existing phone system entirely, routing calls through Microsoft's cloud telephony infrastructure. Staff get a direct dial number, voicemail transcription, and the ability to transfer calls, all within the Teams app they already use. The hardware cost of replacing desk phones is optional since most staff use softphones on their laptops and mobiles.

If your business already pays for Microsoft 365 Business Standard or above, you already have Teams. You are paying for it. The question is whether you are using it to its potential or whether you are also paying separately for Zoom and wondering why communication is fragmented.

When Zoom still makes sense

Zoom biggest advantage is the guest experience, because inviting a client, supplier or candidate to a Teams meeting carries a reasonable chance of a degraded join experience if they do not have a Microsoft account, while Zoom eliminates that friction almost entirely. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

For webinars and large external events, Zoom Webinars remains the best option for most businesses because the registration workflow, attendee management, Q and A tools and post-event analytics are more mature than Teams Live Events or Webex Webinars for organisations without dedicated AV teams. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

Zoom's biggest advantage is the guest experience. When you invite a client, a supplier, or a candidate to a Teams meeting, there is a reasonable chance they will have a degraded join experience if they do not have a Microsoft account. Zoom eliminates that friction almost entirely.

For webinars and large external events, Zoom Webinars remains the best option for most businesses. The registration workflow, attendee management, Q&A tools, and post-event analytics are more mature than Teams Live Events or Webex Webinars for organisations without dedicated AV teams.

A common and sensible setup for Microsoft 365 businesses is to use Teams for everything internal and keep a Zoom Pro or Business licence for client-facing calls and external webinars. This covers both use cases without compromise.

What we usually recommend

A common and sensible setup for Microsoft 365 businesses is Teams as the primary internal collaboration platform plus a small number of Zoom Pro licences for client-facing calls and external webinars where the guest join experience matters, which covers both use cases without the cost and confusion of running all four platforms. market.us, Video Conferencing Statistics 2026.

On Microsoft 365

Use Teams as your primary platform for internal collaboration, file sharing, and calling. Add Zoom Pro for client-facing calls and external webinars where guest join experience matters.

On Google Workspace

Google Meet for internal calls. Zoom for anything client-facing or external where you need a reliable, smooth guest experience.

Government or regulated industry

Webex deserves serious consideration for its compliance posture and end-to-end encryption. Still evaluate Teams if your agency is already on Microsoft 365 Government.

Looking to ditch your phone system

Teams Phone is the cleanest consolidation path for Microsoft 365 businesses. One vendor, one invoice, one admin interface for calls, chat, and meetings.

Related: Teams Rooms Guide, PBX Replacement Guide, Business Internet and Hosted Voice.

Common questions

Is Microsoft Teams or Zoom better for Australian business?
Microsoft Teams is better for internal collaboration if you already run Microsoft 365 because it bundles chat, file sharing and telephony into your existing licences, while Zoom is better for client-facing calls and webinars because its guest join experience is smoother for external participants who have no Microsoft account.
Do you need both Teams and Zoom?
Many Microsoft 365 businesses run both, using Teams as the primary internal collaboration platform and a small number of Zoom Pro licences for client calls and external webinars where the guest join experience matters, which is a sensible setup that covers both use cases without compromise.
Can Microsoft Teams replace your phone system?
Yes. Teams Phone replaces your entire PBX with cloud telephony through Microsoft, giving each staff member a direct dial number, voicemail transcription and call transfer within the Teams app, which means you do not need a separate phone system or desk phones for most users.
Is Webex still relevant for Australian business?
Webex remains relevant for government, legal, healthcare and regulated industries that need end-to-end encryption, compliance recording and certifications like FedRAMP and ISO 27001, though the user experience is less polished than Zoom or Teams and its integration ecosystem is narrower.
Is Google Meet good enough for business?
Google Meet is good enough for internal video calls if you already run Google Workspace because it integrates with Calendar and Drive at no extra cost, but it lacks the webinar capabilities and persistent team channels that make Teams or Zoom more complete collaboration platforms.
What is the biggest mistake businesses make with video conferencing?
The biggest mistake is paying for multiple overlapping platforms like Teams, Zoom and Google Meet simultaneously because nobody made a deliberate decision, which confuses staff about which to use and creates fragmentation, so the right answer is one primary platform for internal collaboration and one fallback for external guests.

Not sure which setup fits your business?

We can review your current communication stack, identify where you are paying for overlap, and recommend the right configuration for your team size, industry, and budget.